Yeah, About That “Atheism as Intellectual Luxury” Thing

So … THIS got written: Atheism is an intellectual luxury for the wealthy

It starts with the writer’s Reasoning Guy bona fides. An atheist at 16, Chris Arnade sneered at religion, even later becoming an actual scientist.

Three years later I did escape my town, eventually receiving a PhD in physics, and then working on Wall Street for 20 years. A life devoted to rational thought, a life devoted to numbers and clever arguments.

During that time I counted myself an atheist and nodded in agreement as a wave of atheistic fervor swept out of the scientific community and into the media, led by Richard Dawkins.

I saw some of myself in him: quick with arguments, uneasy with emotions, comfortable with logic, able to look at any ideology or any thought process and expose the inconsistencies. We all picked on the Bible, a tome cobbled together over hundreds of years that provides so many inconsistencies. It is the skinny 85lb (35.6kg) weakling for anyone looking to flex their scientific muscles.

And then this man of science and reason started photographing homeless people. Talking to them, he discovered they were all strong in their religious faith. Takeesha, Sonya, Eric, Sarah, Michael — decades on the streets as addicts and prostitutes, they know that God is with them, watching over them, keeping them together when nothing else will. According to Arnade, every crack house — in addition to its “needles, caps, lighters and crack pipes” — contains a Bible.

In these last three years, out from behind my computers, I have been reminded that life is not rational and that everyone makes mistakes. Or, in Biblical terms, we are all sinners.

We are all sinners. On the streets the addicts, with their daily battles and proximity to death, have come to understand this viscerally. Many successful people don’t. Their sense of entitlement and emotional distance has numbed their understanding of our fallibility.

Yeah, about that.

I work peripherally with drug users and alcoholics, and I get to talk to a lot of them. Most of the ones I deal with are normal, everyday people who also happen to have this problem. Some are literal street people, hookers and hustlers and worse, others are family men and women with homes and careers. Some are even a bit upper crust, people flying high in life until they suffered auto or motorcycle accidents and got addicted to pain killers.

I’m always 100 percent careful to keep my opinions — of which I have few, because I know I have an 8-year-old’s knowledge of addiction, and I’m not qualified to draw conclusions with so little information — to myself.

But I’ve wondered more than once if this type of deep, deep faith has some direct connection to the addiction and hopelessness. If it’s not just another addiction, or at least an enabler of addiction. If multi-generational exposure to religious unreason, coupled with an equally senseless and abusive government approach to addiction, AND rehabilitation and treatment programs which perpetually emphasize the importance of religion, is what delivers families and individuals into these unimaginably harsh lives, cycling through years of drug use and rehab, drug use and rehab, on and on. I’ve wondered if people not taught to think, or taught NOT to think, are especially vulnerable. I strongly suspect they are.

But no, according to Arnade, this is all Richard Dawkins’ fault, that cold, inhuman, privileged sonofabitch.

I also see Richard Dawkins differently. I see him as a grown up version of that 16-year-old kid, proud of being smart, unable to understand why anyone would believe or think differently from himself. I see a person so removed from humanity and so removed from the ambiguity of life that he finds himself judging those who think differently.

I see someone doing what he claims to hate in others. Preaching from a selfish vantage point.

Judgmental pot, meet faith-based kettle.

  • c2t2

    Ooh, addiction! A topic I know a lot about! Weirdly, I agree with both sides of this argument. Yes, being atheist is a sort of privilege, but not in that way.

    I’ve thought for a while that metaphorical addiction might be the only real excuse for religion.

    Some people’s lives are so desperate that their best option is self-delusion (or substance abuse). In some cases, it IS the rational option.

    If the choice is ‘believe in fairy tales’ or ‘lay down and die’ – well, whatever it takes to get through the day. Sure, your imaginary friend is real and there will be pie in the sky when you die… whatever you say, man.

    If the options are murderous rampage or shooting heroin? Do what ya gotta do.

    Things suck for a whole lot of people, so it’s no surprise that there’s rampant religion addiction throughout the world. And even IF people’s circumstances improve to the point that they don’t need religion as a crutch… Well, the addiction has already set in, but the growing proportion of atheists in the developed world gives me hope anyway.

  • KarenOfRocks

    There seem to be several different psychological models used to explain addiction; as a scientist who knows nothing about psychology, I take the cautious approach that all models are wrong, but some may be useful.

    I’ve heard the term “addictive personality” used, sometimes carefully, sometimes tossed about casually. I’ve never quite understood what the term means, though I gather it means someone who has a tendency to use mind-altering substances/activities to excess (meaning beyond the long-term tolerance of their mind/body) and who has habituated to one mind-altering substance/activity is more likely to switch to or accommodate another such substance/activity than to be able to abandon all of them altogether. This seems to be one model for certain kinds of behavior.

    I consider religious belief to be a mind-altering activity, in that it changes mental focus. So, is it easy for people suffering from substance abuse to turn to religion because they have an addictive personality? It’s certainly one possibility.

  • Machintelligence

    Religion feeds on misery. Make life better and religion fades away. Take Western Europe after WW2, for example.

  • Frank

    It is better to seek a rational approach to hardships rather than promising people that an imaginary sky god loves them, but will only give them help once they are dead. Understandably, religion can elevate the self-esteem of the poor like drugs and alcohol, yet the poor need aid and guidance to resolve their circumstances, not bibles, sermons, and praying for help. The world is filled with misery and we can to do something about it instead of hiding away in a fantasy that tells us this life doesn’t matter, believers will live in eternal paradise. Secular beliefs and science will always trump religion.
    Furthermore, “intellectual luxury” isn’t an insult, people need access to resources to become better informed, and anyone can judge different beliefs because all beliefs are not equally justifiable. I suppose they didn’t teach either of that to Chris Arnade at college, an institution of “intellectual luxury” and accurate instruction. A PH.D. in Physics? Yeah, right.